Artificial Scarcity: Resource-Based 'Anything' Making You Feel 'At Home'
We are the living Earth, but soon we will even get to pay rent on it!
Giammaria Ortes: The Decadent Venetian Kook Who Originated The Myth of "Carrying Capacity"
Eugenics [1] is en vogue, but very old... and this green skinned watermelon has a red inside! (Mean Green Meme and Communism)
The Venus Project, Jacques Fresco, Peter Joseph, Zeitgeist Movement, Carrying Capacity,... all of them based upon fraud.
And
if you try to make it known to them, they block you (my experiences). I
have a question that Fresco doesn't allow to be posed, not to mention
answer:
Did we suffer from a lack of electricity before Tesla (and those before him) came and showed us how to make use of it?
Resource-based
'anything' (the idea stems from Giammaria Ortes in the Venetian era
and taken up by Malthus [2]) is a fiction! [3]
And with the
Venus Project, it is at best willful ignorance. They must know better
(they have been confronted on this), but will not accept anything that
conflicts with their previous dogma (especially when it lies at its very
foundation!).
[1] http://tarpley.net/online-books/against-oligarchy/venices-war-against-western-civilization/
[2] http://tarpley.net/online-books/against-oligarchy/giammaria-ortes-the-decadent-venetian-kook-who-originated-the-myth-of-carrying-capacity/
[3] Here's a recording of Dr. Tarpley describing this work. (12 Minutes).
http://tarpley.net/malthus-and-the-social-darwinists-ideologues-of-genocide/
Sunday, June 28, 2015
Friday, June 26, 2015
Nascent Mind, Prescient Knowledge: Instinct And Envisioning
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleiades
This 'event horizon' is so crucial to understanding and participating in mind; yet those who should know better simply ignore or overlook it.
Tesla's statement here rings so true that it simply boggles my mind and confirms that Tesla was 'tuned into it.'
He clearly exhibited these awarenesses on several occasions. He was able to envision many ideas to their completion before constructing them; and his instinct for somehow 'knowing' (flashes of insight) what to do next and where to go with an idea were so profound that it often overwhelmed and incapacitated him. His mind was so fertile that layers of creative impulses were being maintained concurrently.
Next to Socrates there are very few who inspire me. Tesla is one of those few.
Sunday, May 31, 2015
Quantum Weirdness To Meaninglessness
Quantum Weirdness To Meaninglessness
Physicists: your days are numbered. Don't say we didn't warn you.
Owen Maroney worries that physicists have spent the better part of a century engaging in fraud.
It's a mess!
Ever since they invented quantum theory in the early 1900s, explains Maroney, who is himself a physicist at the University of Oxford, UK, they have been talking about how strange it is — how it allows particles and atoms to move in many directions at once, for example, or to spin clockwise and anticlockwise simultaneously. But talk is not proof, says Maroney. “If we tell the public that quantum theory is weird, we better go out and test that's actually true,” he says. "Otherwise we're not doing science, we're just explaining some funny squiggles on a blackboard."
Link to document: http://www.nature.com/polopoly_fs/1.17585!/menu/main/topColumns/topLeftColumn/pdf/521278a.pdf
Sadly, the writer doesn't grasp the depth and breath of the whole affair: It's not only physics!
The time is coming when every single card in their 'house of cards' is going to come down.
They've been lying to us everywhere:
1) Uncertainty
2) Chaos
3) Randomness
4) Philosophy
5) Complexity
6) Meaning
7) Scarcity
8) Mathematics
...
The list goes on and on. I'm one of those who are going to bring the whole charade down... and I'm not alone.
Physicists: your days are numbered. Don't say we didn't warn you.
Owen Maroney worries that physicists have spent the better part of a century engaging in fraud.
It's a mess!
Ever since they invented quantum theory in the early 1900s, explains Maroney, who is himself a physicist at the University of Oxford, UK, they have been talking about how strange it is — how it allows particles and atoms to move in many directions at once, for example, or to spin clockwise and anticlockwise simultaneously. But talk is not proof, says Maroney. “If we tell the public that quantum theory is weird, we better go out and test that's actually true,” he says. "Otherwise we're not doing science, we're just explaining some funny squiggles on a blackboard."
Link to document: http://www.nature.com/polopoly_fs/1.17585!/menu/main/topColumns/topLeftColumn/pdf/521278a.pdf
Sadly, the writer doesn't grasp the depth and breath of the whole affair: It's not only physics!
The time is coming when every single card in their 'house of cards' is going to come down.
They've been lying to us everywhere:
1) Uncertainty
2) Chaos
3) Randomness
4) Philosophy
5) Complexity
6) Meaning
7) Scarcity
8) Mathematics
...
The list goes on and on. I'm one of those who are going to bring the whole charade down... and I'm not alone.
Friday, May 29, 2015
Precursors Of Knowledge
Precursors Of Knowledge
Fractal fields provide a nice framework in which to think about knowledge. They are not all we need for precision, but they are helpful in a generic way. I'll be posting more on them as the knowledge representations are published, because there are many 'gaps to fill' to show how these relate to knowledge.
A Unifying Topology of Fractal Fields
More sources:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2nTLI89vdzg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZVNIZGw4X0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yp4ogF2w13M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UPD2_gEjvM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ArZLXHVVV5I
Fractal fields provide a nice framework in which to think about knowledge. They are not all we need for precision, but they are helpful in a generic way. I'll be posting more on them as the knowledge representations are published, because there are many 'gaps to fill' to show how these relate to knowledge.
A Unifying Topology of Fractal Fields
More sources:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2nTLI89vdzg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZVNIZGw4X0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yp4ogF2w13M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UPD2_gEjvM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ArZLXHVVV5I
Tuesday, May 26, 2015
Coming Soon To A World Near You
The time is coming when we will exchange massive amounts of knowledge between us without any corporation standing in between.
My life's work is dedicated to this vision and I'm actually carrying it out right in front of you!
We will not only create and share our books, documents, web sites, search results, and media with each other - we will be sharing their conceptual landscapes.
The time is coming when we will exchange massive amounts of knowledge between us without any corporation standing in between.
My life's work is dedicated to this vision and I'm actually carrying it out right in front of you!
We will not only create and share our books, documents, web sites, search results, and media with each other - we will be sharing their conceptual landscapes.
Crimes Of Our Educators
They are heralded as pioneers and bold educators, but the truth is completely different. Wilhelm Wundt and John Dewey among them, they had the designs of their paymasters (banksters like Rockefeller) in their focus as they planted the seeds of destruction of our education system in the USA and Europe.
My own investigations into the systematic corruption of science since the early 19th Century (with encroachment being documented even earlier) dovetails nicely with this book. It confirms my conclusions and even fills in some of the details. More on these investigations of mine are forthcoming.
Utopian dictators like Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, and Mao are criminals – genocidal psychopaths who have killed more human beings in the last hundred years than any other ideologues in history. They don't limit their murder to individuals, but to entire nations.
In the United States another form of Utopians, the "progressives," have tried to destroy traditional America by strategically dumbing down her people. America's future is being crippled on purpose in order to fundamentally transform the nation, its values, and its system of government. Laid out a century ago by progressive luminary John Dewey, the fruits of his schemes are plain to see today. Dewey got rid of the traditional intensive phonics method of instruction and imposed a "look-say," "sight," or "whole-word" method that forces children to read English as if it were Chinese. The method is widely used in today's public schools, which is a major reason there are so many failing public schools that cannot teach children the basics. This can only be considered a blatant form of child abuse.
American author and veteran educator Samuel Blumenfeld and journalist Alex Newman have taken on the public education establishment as never before and exposed it for the de facto criminal enterprise it is.
Crimes of the Educators reveals how the architects of America's public school disaster implemented a plan to socialize the United States by knowingly and willingly dumbing down the population, a mission closer to success than ever as the Obama administration works relentlessly to nationalize K-12 schooling with Common Core.
The whole-word method of teaching children to read – introduced by John Dewey and colleagues in the early twentieth century and which permeates Common Core – is a significant cause of dyslexia among students. Public education's war against religion, the "great American math disaster," promotion of death education, and the government's plan to lower standards for all so "no one is left behind" is destroying the logic, reasoning, and overall educational prowess of America's next generation.
According to the Program for International Student Assessment, which collects test results from 65 countries for its rankings.
In reading, students in 19 other locales scored higher than U.S. students
In science, 22 education systems scored above the U.S.
In mathematics, 29 nations and other jurisdictions outperformed the United States
Journalist Henry Mencken said it best in 1924 when he wrote that the aim of public education is "to reduce as many individuals as possible to the same safe level, to breed and train a standardized citizenry, to put down dissent and originality."
It is time to hold the Department of Education accountable for the crimes of the educators.
UK:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Crimes-Educators-Utopians-Government-Americas/dp/1938067126/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1432624741&sr=8-1-fkmr0&keywords=Crimes+of+our+Educators
USA:
http://www.amazon.com/Crimes-Educators-Utopians-Government-Americas/dp/1938067126/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1432620209&sr=8-1&keywords=blumenfeld+newman
Germany:
http://www.amazon.de/gp/product/1938067126?psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=oh_aui_detailpage_o00_s00
Special Price in USA:
http://store.infowars.com/Crimes-Of-The-Educators_p_1552.html
3D Scientific Visualization with Blender
It's a book everyone in knowledge representation should at least know about. It has great tips and clarifications inside.
Unfortunately it is also based solely on ontologies so it provides only limited value for what I'm doing, but it is a valuable resource for understanding and creating visualizations just the same.
Video - Rendering a data cube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GvTTVEeEmk
Video - Colliding galaxies:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPuVfiWLlHI
Tuesday, May 5, 2015
(Lynda.com - Overview of Data Visualization)
Information Visualization Is Not Knowledge Representation
This great video from Lynda.com shows how the processing language/interpreter is great for modeling information.
With such a multitude of interesting ways to model data, we find it hard to resist the temptation to call this knowledge, but it's not!
All of the wonderful representations here still require us to interpret their meaning!
What if there were a way to present knowledge in which our own understanding is not required to interpret them? What if our understanding of what we have presented to us becomes part of the presentation itself, and in fact, influences what we take from that representation?
We obviously need knowledge representation that can provide their meaning on their own for only they can provide a true understanding of their inherent structure and dynamics.
You see real understanding is the personalization of knowledge into your own mind. If your mind cannot dialog with that knowledge, it's not really yours and if your mind does all the work, it's only information.
Information Visualization Is Not Knowledge Representation
This great video from Lynda.com shows how the processing language/interpreter is great for modeling information.
With such a multitude of interesting ways to model data, we find it hard to resist the temptation to call this knowledge, but it's not!
All of the wonderful representations here still require us to interpret their meaning!
What if there were a way to present knowledge in which our own understanding is not required to interpret them? What if our understanding of what we have presented to us becomes part of the presentation itself, and in fact, influences what we take from that representation?
We obviously need knowledge representation that can provide their meaning on their own for only they can provide a true understanding of their inherent structure and dynamics.
You see real understanding is the personalization of knowledge into your own mind. If your mind cannot dialog with that knowledge, it's not really yours and if your mind does all the work, it's only information.
Wednesday, April 22, 2015
Good Intentions - False Causality - Sadly, Therefore Meager Cure
Good Intentions - False Causality - Sadly, Therefore Meager Cure
Earth Day: This is another brilliant video that unfortunately assigns the condition of our world to humans as a whole.
Certainly WE ALL are responsible by allowing it to happen in OUR name, but the corporations (artificial persons) and the banksters (which run the corporations) are who have performed the deed!
Yes, WE looked on, but we trusted them and they failed us all. Now WE must do something about it!
He is absolutely wrong in that we must NOT look away from how our governments are dictated by corporations! (which have become the real countries) We are losing our individual and collective sovereignty through ruses like 'Climate Change' (Global taxing scheme).
We should now take the corporations down and replace them with real humans and not the 1871 version that allows them to enjoy those rights of being human and yet are exempt from the responsibilities that real humans must answer to.
http://byronwine.com/files/1871.pdf
http://drrichswier.com/2015/04/21/15-supreme-court-decisions-that-shredded-the-constitution/
This man is well intentioned, but not up to par on what needs to be done. He is passionate, but unfortunately not enlightened.
The onus is on us for allowing it to continue, but the onus is on the corporations and banksters, for directing humanity towards where we have come!
Why is Fukushima no longer in the news?
Why is the Gulf spill no longer in the news?
Why do we no longer think about them?
Here is where WE ALL are responsible!
http://collectivelyconscious.net/articles/the-gulf-oil-spill-you-never-heard-about-may-be-the-largest-ever/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dK_EJqat1sc
Sunday, April 19, 2015
Science And Technology Run Amok - Nr. 2 - Office Drones!
Science And Technology Run Amok - Nr. 2
Let's just get it out there and forget the discussion of whether the technology is good for us or not!
When we allow this technology to be sold, we are tacitly accepting the use of drones everywhere. When we buy this technology, we are actively supporting it's implementation and dissemination!
Do we really want these things flying around us? Using them allows our 'masters' to hide in plain sight with other drones which are less beneficial to our mutual interests than these shown here!
I define the term "Run Amok" as 'Without open consideration and debate of the moral, ethical, political, social, sovereignty issues' in the conception, design, creation, production, distribution, and practice/implementation of technology and science.
Thursday, April 16, 2015
You Are Significant In Your Insignificance!
You Are Significant in Your Insignificance!
That's what they're selling you with this graph. This is a ruse used very often by hucksters and snake-oil salesmen. They offer you the sugar with their 'bitters'.
"We didn't mean it that way." they'll tell you...
How many unsuspecting people believe this sophisticated form of lying? Now, see it with 'new eyes'.
Thursday, April 9, 2015
The Parasites 'Need' a Pow Wow
The Parasites 'Need' a Pow Wow
The 'need' (control/fear fetish) for full-spectrum dominance.
We must live out their nightmare so that they can save us. Will they be proud of their 'work' in a galactic context when our neighbors see what we're up to?
We suffer from an awful shortage of humans in the universe, but they tell us there's too many of us!
It's all an expression of their fear and need to control others. Even where there are no problems, they will create them so that they may mark them, touch them and make them 'safe'.
Our problem isn't a lack of resources, it's the hoarding of them!
Wednesday, March 25, 2015
Scarcity Fetish Served Hot and Dry
Image Credit: © Cecilia Lim / Fotolia (see original source)
Scarcity Fetish Served Hot and DryMore artificial scarcity. Why don't we try ridding ourselves of just one medium sized weapons system. Then we could feed everyone in the world.
Then we could stop suppressing free energy. When we do that we could harvest water out of the air, use it for fuel and drink the exhaust!
This is simply another attempt to get us to accept the privatization of water! We are the living Earth, but if we continue, we'll all be renters on our own home!
Did we suffer from a shortage of electricity before Tesla showed us how to make use of it? The parasitic banksters who fund our science (i.e. how we are taught to frame things) have been harping about overpopulation for over 5 centuries (it started during the time of Machiavelli). If they wanted a solution, we would have had one by now. They don't want a solution to an artificial problem until they can sell us an artificial solution.
We should learn to see through this crap! They're framing everything now in terms of scarcity and we lap it up like trendy mainstream pablum!
We are suffering from a shortage of humans in the universe. Do your share by having many children who don't hoard like banksters. http://overpopulationisamyth.com/
Tuesday, March 24, 2015
Rationally Bayesian Doesn't Help You See The Elephant!
Here a proven social engineering device 'conspiracy theory' is being
used to contrast Bayesian logic and fails miserably in discovering truth
by doing so.The example used for 'conspiracy thinking' was the ignorance of an elected official during WW2, California Governor Earl Warren https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earl_Warren
Who interestingly enough, got placed on the Supreme Court by the parasitic class later in his career!
We literally swim in a world of conspiracies (look up LIBOR scandal, for just one example: http://www.liborscandal.org/index.html), yet we are supposed to marginalize each other with ridicule like 'nut job' and 'conspiracy theorist' to keep us in the 'safe' and 'permissible' trendy mainstream dominant social memes.
The criminal banksters and their corporations get to hide in plain sight and we police each other for crossing boundaries they have set for us! They can wreak havoc on our planet and blame humanity for their deeds. Note however, that Bayesian Logic can't even grasp this structure and dynamics.
This shows how a statistical and frequency-oriented approach to looking at our world is no guarantee of even seeing the proverbial 'elephant in the room'!
Tuesday, March 17, 2015
Hoarding Can Be Cancer Too
Hoarding Can Be Cancer Too
This short video's symbolism and message is paradigm changing. The video stems from a religious message and also contains a bit of idealism, but has meaning even to agnostics and atheists alike.
The Universe is suffering from a shortage of humans right now. Please do your share to rectify this situation by having many children who do not need to hoard.
The true measure of the value of a society finds expression in how it treats its weakest members: the old, infirm, and children.
Sunday, March 1, 2015
'Mission Creep' 'At the Gate'
'Mission Creep' 'At the Gate'
Fear-control fetish power grab to keep us (them) 'safe'.
VIDEO
This post offers a brief and partial answer to the question: "Why is it that humanity must suffer so deeply and yet those who cause that suffering can bring themselves to inflict such harm on others?" There is what I call a disjunct in the minds of those who can make others suffer... it happens this way: It starts with fear. If you mix that fear with high intelligence (which most of them have), the fear is amplified very drastically. Their knowledge of the world around them gives them even that much more to fear, because they are so intelligent. The 'snake' begins to eat it's own tail and causes begin to create themselves anew - with each new coil of the snake their fear manifests its own reasons to increase!
That fear leads to their need to control in order to compensate for it. They notice though that most other people are trusting. They convince themselves (wrongly) that those trusting people around them are less sophisticated than they (i.e. they become an exception to themselves with respect to the rest of humanity), otherwise those others would need to fear and need to control as much as they do.
Ergo: those who are trusting are schmucks or 'makes' that are asking to be screwed.
In order to counter this distortion they sense in their view of the world, they tell themselves they are 'special' and lie to themselves reaching hegemonic conviction with statements like: "The ends justify the means." or any other permission to continue making their world 'safe'. The truth is that the ends are determined by their means. (destructive means ALWAYS lead to destructive ends - it's a natural law)
This 'cancer' begins to cause a feedback loop in their psyche. They need to 'touch' and 'mark' all things they purvey to make themselves 'safe'. It metastasizes into a need to even control and pervert everything and everyone around them. They can't even have sex without some sort of perversion. It's usually they who become pedophiles.
Their obsession with control mechanisms forces them to confuse chutzpah with ruthlessness and bravery with cruelty. It is also they who 'paint' our skies with artificial clouds to witness their 'mark' in assuaging their fear and to express their thirst for more control.
Wednesday, February 11, 2015
Social Engineering and Propaganda Placement via Humor Moves On
Social Engineering and Propaganda Placement via Humor Moves On
Jon Stewart (Leibowitz), the comedian who made Comedy Central’s “The Daily Show With Jon Stewart,” a nightly home for sharp-edged political satire and up-to-the-moment commentary on the news, said on Tuesday that he planned to leave the program.
Mr. Stewart made the announcement on Tuesday’s episode. His departure was confirmed by the channel, which said in a statement, “Jon will remain at the helm of ‘The Daily Show’ until later this year.”http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/11/arts/television/jon-stewart-leaving-daily-show.html
Hiding in Plain Sight - The Empress is Naked
Hiding in Plain Sight - The Empress is Naked
Destructive Memes For the Undiscerning Mind
Let's blame all of humanity for the sins of a parasitic 'elite' who knows nothing better than to destroy in order to create. If things were as they should be, we would be living in the clouds and traveling to the stars right now.
This is how unrestrained bankster-led corporatism hides in plain sight. If they can paint us a picture in which WE are the problem, then the failure of those we trusted to guide and steward our world don't stand out anymore.
Will they be be proud of their eugenics and their attempt to divide humanity against itself? What account will they tend of their stewardship of Earth? Will our galactic neighbors trust a species who is a danger to itself? Those who do this to humanity in order to rule the world destroy themselves as well.
#Parasitism #CultureOfFear #PrematureGlobalism #DivideAndConquer #SocialEngineering #Propaganda #PropagandaPlacement #Fraud #Agenda21 #ICLEI #DelphiTechnique #WeaponizedCulture
Wednesday, September 3, 2014
Knowledge is What Awareness Does - Knowledge Representation as a Means to Define Knowledge Precisely
What is
this video about?
In this introductory
video I would like to explain what knowledge representation is, how
to build and apply them. There are basically three phases involved in
the process of building a knowledge representation. Acquisition of
data (which includes staging), collation and the representation
itself.
The collation and
the representation phases of the process are mentioned here, but I
will explain them further in future videos.
You are now watching
a simulation of the acquisition phase as it collects and stores
preliminary structure from the data it encounters in terms of the
vocabulary contained within that data. Acquisition is a necessary
prerequisite for the collation phase following it, because the
information it creates from the data are used by the collation
algorithms which then transform that information into knowledge. The
statistics you are seeing tabulated are only a small subset of those
collected in a typical acquisition phase. Each of these counters are
being updated in correspondence to the recognition coming from
underlying parsers running in the background. Depending upon the
computer resources involved in the acquisition, these parsers may
even even run concurrently as is shown in this simulation.
The objects you see
moving around in the video are of two different kinds: knowledge
fields or knowledge molecules. Those nearest to
you are the field representations of the actual data being collected
called knowledge fields. They could represent an individual
symbol, punctuation, morpheme, lexeme, word, emotion, perspective, or
some other unit of information in the data. Each of them contain
their own signature – even if their value, state or other intrinsic
properties are unknown or indeterminate during the acquisition.
Those farther away
from the view are clusters of fields which have already coalesced
into groups according to shared dynamically adaptive factors such as
similarity, relation, cardinality, ordinality,...
These 'molecules'
also contain their own set of signatures and may be composed of a
mixture of fields, meta-fields and hyper-fields that are unique to
all others. The collation phase has the job of assigning these
molecules to their preliminary holarchical domains
which are then made visible in the resulting knowledge
representation. Uniqueness is preserved even if they contain common
elements with others in the domain they occupy. Clusters of
knowledge molecules and/or fields grouped together are known as
'knowledge domains', 'structural domains', 'dynamical domains' or
'resonance domains', depending upon which of their aspects is being
emphasized
https://independent.academia.edu/CareyGButler for the more information.
Monday, August 11, 2014
Does a Nobel Prize Automatically Make You Correct?
My attention has been recently brought again to the book: Thinking, Fast and Slow. There
is so much ‘work’ out there to comment on that it would take many
lifetimes to cover it all, but this one hits me right in the gut: it’s about heuristics. This
post will delve into the misconceptions in the book regarding a
heuristic and heuristics in general with respect to mind, thought and,
most importantly, knowledge and its representation.
There is a universal constant in our universe that I call the ‘Near and Far Contraposition’. This constant is responsible for the effect we experience when we look at things close up verses far away. It ‘makes it’s appearance’ when we say things like; “He can’t see the forest for the trees.” I will describe this constant more below as time permits me to do so.
His System 1 (Intuition) is, in reality, taking relational bearing on entities involving deeper scope (among other factors) than in his System 2.
Whereas his System 2 is taking that relational bearing with
entities involving more shallow scope (among other factors) to entities
than in his System 1.
His systems will be shown to be completely unnecessary. There are ‘systems’ within consciousness, but they are not where Daniel says they are.
I’m amazed that someone of his depth is unable (or unwilling) to recognize this!
Your thoughts are welcome too. We all are impacted by this artificial
environment created for us that causes stress and economy in our lives.
It is possible to an extent to ‘divorce’ ourselves from these frenetic
states, but when our customers do not ‘cooperate’ (due to different
priorities, perspectives and needs) with our efforts, then it does
present challenges for us.
Sunday, August 10, 2014
Steven Pinker - Too Much Morality?
![]() |
Too much morality? I'm listening to this right now. I'll post my thoughts on it here when I get the chance.
I
have already begun to write responses on YouTube. I'm working on my
project now so I will get back later. I have to stop for a time to get
my work done. There is so much wrong with this 'philosophy' that needs
to get out there. Here are the posts thus far:
@36:05
you state that terror groups may be started with a half-dozen sitting
in a barber shop or pub in the attempt to sell us on the idea that
terrorism can arise out of our own midst. Most of the terror groups that
ever did so were larger groups and most of them (probably almost all)
were infiltrated by our own governmental agencies who then radicalised
and financed their terrorism. This was made clear to be the case with
the Klu Klux Klan in the 1950s and 60s.
@36:10 “And
there can be nasty surprises…”
You don’t take into account the fact that almost all narcissistic despots have been put in by ‘global players’ (and banksters and higher up the ‘food chain’). And for “spreading revolution” why not turn your attention how the US, NATO and Saudi Arabia have joined forces in coordinating Al Qaeda (AL-C-I-A-dah) in Syria?
You don’t take into account the fact that almost all narcissistic despots have been put in by ‘global players’ (and banksters and higher up the ‘food chain’). And for “spreading revolution” why not turn your attention how the US, NATO and Saudi Arabia have joined forces in coordinating Al Qaeda (AL-C-I-A-dah) in Syria?
@36:23 “So
there are nasty shocks. There are [sic.] a baseline level of violence
that, except for a totalitarian state, you’re never going to stamp out
to zero…”
A totalitarian state is where the violence a society endures reaches its climax. At that ‘place’ humanity begins to ‘shed its skin’ and replace the tyranny with liberty and freedom.
A totalitarian state is where the violence a society endures reaches its climax. At that ‘place’ humanity begins to ‘shed its skin’ and replace the tyranny with liberty and freedom.
@37:00 “…I
think history is going to push in that direction. And it’s not because I
think that there’s some forced ‘mysterious’ [facial language nuances
attempting to evoke the idea of ridicule of the topic being brought to
awareness] dialectical arc of justice that’s gonna’ bring us to Utopia.”
Hegelian dialectic is one of a few dialectical forms that takes on the illusion of being correct. Hegel didn’t honestly consider that there are other kinds of dialectic forms that can occur.
Hegelian dialectic is one of a few dialectical forms that takes on the illusion of being correct. Hegel didn’t honestly consider that there are other kinds of dialectic forms that can occur.
As a professor of cognitive science and
psychology you should be aware of a multitude of dialectic forms that
build a spectrum of impetus for evolutionary change (I prefer the terms enfolding/unfolding).
Every time humanity inserts itself as the centre of the
universe of discourse, it makes itself sick. Morality becomes negotiable
and expedience takes the upper hand. We must save ourselves by not
giving into the temptation of believing we must control our mutual
reality in all of its forms.
This ‘insertion” of humanity is an expression of our
tendency towards Anthropomorphism. It is often so subtle that we don’t
recognise it in its many forms. We haven’t yet recognised the
omni-morphistic structure of our Cosmos (of which we and our universe is a
part.) [Please remember this in reading my other comments here!]
@37:38 “We
can eke out longer and longer life spans…”
This is not necessarily a measure of progress. Far more important is the quality of that life span. The elitist mindset has a great deal of inherent hubris as it carries out the ‘stewardship’ of humanity. If it were REALLY concerned with the development of better life spans, then it would stop the overwhelming fraud in finance markets and use those ‘resources’ to feed and educate those of need. Look at our cities. Life is being sucked out.
This is not necessarily a measure of progress. Far more important is the quality of that life span. The elitist mindset has a great deal of inherent hubris as it carries out the ‘stewardship’ of humanity. If it were REALLY concerned with the development of better life spans, then it would stop the overwhelming fraud in finance markets and use those ‘resources’ to feed and educate those of need. Look at our cities. Life is being sucked out.
There are so many axes of human development that mankind
hasn’t even begun to catalog nor is even aware exists. Some of the most
gifted people have to “eke out” (borrowing your wording) an existence
on the street and the best our science can do for them is to give them
drugs so that they’re quiet and docile. The intellectual ‘body’ of
humanity is RESPONSIBLE for the welfare and potential of those who are
less fortunate, but instead it occupies itself with overpopulation myths
& means of control.
One last comment in this ‘instalment': When I refer to
Anthropomorphism I include all of its ‘inflections’. If I need to
clarify this, let me know (if you even bother to read this).
I’m back to posting on this video in case someone’s
interested. Look at the comment section to follow me. Please be patient
as I have little time to spare for it, but it is very important to
provide an alternative perspective on what Steven Pinker is saying.
@42:00 you call for ethics centred upon a spectrum of "who get's hurt/who flourishes" (utilitarianism) and @42:34
you state that thinking like an economist makes people better off! With
the world in the shape it's in? Open bankster fraud &
fear-control-fetish abounds. Utilitarianism offers no guarantee of
individual rights!
It's
moral reductionism where the majority decides even over fundamental
basic rights of freedom and liberty of individuals. Also utilitarianism
is unable to facilitate/account for all of what being human is.
Subscribing to a morality based upon utility is inherently a danger to
humanity. Means and Ends become disharmonious and lacking integrity.
I'm
analysing the video in my spare time and have discovered that pinker is
a brilliant coordinator or nexus for premature globalism. If I am
wrong, please help me out because that's how the analysis is going.
Wednesday, January 16, 2013
The ends justify the means? A type of meme called a constant.
A lie:
The ends justify their means.
It is a classic justification for the use of methods not congruent with the goal or intention set forth.
A truth:
The ends are determined by their means.
If you use means not congruent with a goal or intention, then the goal or intention changes accordingly.
This is an example of a type of meme I call a ‘constant’. Constants fulfill at least one condition: they are valid everywhere in our Cosmos (or Kosmos, if you prefer).
The ends justify their means.
It is a classic justification for the use of methods not congruent with the goal or intention set forth.
A truth:
The ends are determined by their means.
If you use means not congruent with a goal or intention, then the goal or intention changes accordingly.
This is an example of a type of meme I call a ‘constant’. Constants fulfill at least one condition: they are valid everywhere in our Cosmos (or Kosmos, if you prefer).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)














